Best are Hz panels however. They have the lowest response times while keeping RTC artifacts also very low. Sheninat0r Senior member. Jun 8, 1 DominionSeraph said:. Why would a resolution be better on a screen? You must log in or register to reply here. Graphics Cards 3 Nov 27, Similar threads Question What a time for fans to go out! Question More RAM - any difference if you are playing with integrated graphics?
Question First time with an AMD card Question Nvidia branded RTX vs. Post thread. CPUs and Overclocking. Graphics Cards. AnandTech is part of Future plc, an international media group and leading digital publisher.
Visit our corporate site. All rights reserved. England and Wales company registration number Top Bottom. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies. Accept Learn more…. Question What a time for fans to go out! Today at AM. Oct 1, Aug 8, Search Advanced…. Log in. Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4.
Support UI. X Donate Contact us. New posts Trending Search forums. What's new. New posts New profile posts Latest activity. Current visitors New profile posts Search profile posts Billboard Trophies. Is there any difference in 2ms vs 5ms monitors for gaming and whats the best brand? Thread starter MrAcd Start date Oct 26, Forums Hardware Displays. JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Previous Next Sort by votes.
MrAcd Honorable. Feb 21, 0 10, 8. Im stuck between a few monitors but some of the monitors are 5ms. I was also wondering who made the best monitors to game on, i heard it was ASUS so i have been looking into them but if there is different i would like to know? P1nnacle Distinguished. Sep 12, 1, 0 19, It's a pretty big difference moving from a 16ms monitor, but not so much between 2 and 5, I don't know what your budget is, but if you can afford one, BenQ monitors are the MLG monitor of choice, and owning one myself, I absolutely love them.
If you're big into tweitch based games, getting a Hz monitor is a good idea too, it will give you a noticable advantage in games. Expensive, but worth it. I Am User Honorable. Dec 31, 52 0 10, 2. The difference between 2 and 5 isn't big, and you shouldn't even notice it. Personally, I like Philips monitors best. Okay, between the two i am looking at, here are the specs,. I have an Asus 27" monitor with 2ms delay, and it is the fastest response time I have had on a monitor, since my last CRT monitor.
My old LCD was a 25 ms delay, and that was not good for online gaming, though many average people may not notice delays. If gaming is your priority, especially if it is online gaming, I would suggest you get the Asus 2ms monitor.
It is not worth getting waxed by some noob, just cause he has a faster monitor than yours, haha. Originally Posted by Noahtuck. With both the Hor. Originally Posted by jagabo. One advantage I see to a LED display is little or no change in the backlight levels over the lifespan of the monitor.
I have older florescent backlit monitors that have very little contrast as the tube is dying. The case is much slimmer and lighter and the unit puts out a lot less heat than the 19" LCD florescent backlit display it replaced. On the downside, the black levels aren't quite as good as the Hanns G 19" it replaced.
But that is more attributable to manufacturer design than using a LED backlight. With the Viewsonic and a black screen, there is a little bleed from the backlight around the edges, but I suspect a better quality monitor would have less.
If at all possible, I would view the monitor in person as the manufacturer specifications don't really mean much, IMO. I would bring my own test disc if they will let you.
Great black levels are a big plus for me, more important than refresh times. But I don't game. Not much difference in 2ms and 5ms. Calibrated for video, photo and print accuracy. For low-end consumer monitors made for watching movies and playing games, like you're wanting, I generally suggest an Acer, if available in the specs desired. But in reality, is 2ms response time good for gaming? A 2ms response time is good for gaming. With a 2ms response time coupled with a decent refresh rate, you will notice a remarkable improvement in the gaming experience, including how smooth, fast, and responsive-to-control your gameplay is.
Response time ms in gaming is defined as the amount of time it takes from the time a person makes a request or calls a control to the time the request receives a response. It also refers to the speed at which the monitor transits from one color to another and from one shade to another. Is 1ms Response Time Good for Gaming?
0コメント